posted 04/17/08 06:51 PM | updated 01/04/09 04:21 PM

Nickels Pushing Mercer Fix


The Stranger has been following Mayor Greg Nickels' crusade for the Mercer Corridor Project. He's trying to pull a fast one on the city council, but they aren't buying it.
Mayor Greg Nickels has proposed a measure that would release $25 million in city funding to pay for bonds on two projects: the new Spokane Street Viaduct and the conversion of Mercer Street in South Lake Union into a two-way boulevard. The mayor's proposal links both projects together in a single ordinance; passing the ordinance would mean funding both a popular project (Spokane) and a controversial one (Mercer) simultaneously.

The Spokane proposal, which would ease congestion for drivers coming into the city from West Seattle, appears to have unanimous support on the city council, while the Mercer proposal, which the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) contends will make it easier for drivers to access I-5 and improve travel times to nearby neighborhoods, is far more contentious. SDOT and mayoral staffers say the Mercer proposal, which would convert Mercer into a two-way boulevard and reconnect some of the street grid in South Lake Union, will improve access for cars, bikes, and pedestrians if the city moves forward with a surface/transit option for replacing the viaduct.
The city council's concern lies primarily in the Mayor's optimistic funding plan, and whether the plan would do actually do anything to fix the "Mercer Mess".
At the moment, the committee appears inclined to move forward with funding for Spokane, and yellow-light Mercer until funding can be locked down—perhaps 6 to 12 months. That would mean Mercer construction would overlap with viaduct construction. Another option would be holding off on Mercer construction until the viaduct work is finished—an option that would push work on Mercer off until 2018 or beyond. The transportation committee will take a vote on the Mercer and Spokane proposals on May 6.
Here we have a case of the council reinforcing the single driver commute, and scrutinizing a plan to make the city more pedestrian-friendly and livable. What if we lived in a world in which the Mercer Corridor Project and a surface street-viaduct replacement had unanimous support, and the Spokane Street Viaduct project was met with disdain? Wouldn't that be nice.
Tags:
CommentsRSS Feed
Comments are no longer allowed on this discussion.
I agree with jonathan. At least the mayor is trying to do SOMETHING. There is no perfect solution, but no one has come up with anything better. And we have been talking about this for years and years.

Here's my two cents worth of blogging on this:

http://tinyurl.com/59vh4u
Comment by Jim Reppond April 18, 2008 (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
Something has to be done to modify Mercer and, at least, the Mayor is applying ideas towards the ultimate solution. Right now, I hate walking along Mercer at any time of the day. You either look over your shoulder at the car blazing up the right lane or choke on the fumes from thousands of single commuters leaving the city for the burbs in the evening, or like what happened to us, almost get wiped out on the sidewalk by Far Fetched by someone who thought the sidewalk was part of the road. Once the Amazon buildings are up, it will not make any sense to keep the ugly monstrosity as it is now and beautification will have to take place. We need to make sure our leaders know this and shape Mercer into a Main Street that will suit the residents of the neighborhood, not the residents of Kirkland and Bothell. Remember, it is not just a pathway for Hummers and Saabs to leave the city, it is also part of a neighborhood and should be treated as such.
Comment by Jonathan April 17, 2008 (0 votes) (report abuse) (reply)
advertisement